Use these prompts when you need to think through a matter strategically: surfacing key issues, finding supporting evidence, developing next steps, or pressure-testing a position before you act on it.
Pull every passage from a document that supports a specific position you're trying to advance.
Research the attached document for language, facts, or provisions that support the position currently under discussion in this matter, including any passages that undercut or qualify it. For each, quote the language, cite the location, and explain how strongly it supports or weakens the position. Don't stretch — return only what genuinely fits, and flag if support is thin.State the position in the matter or in the conversation before running — the prompt pulls from that rather than asking you to type it inline.
Turns the facts and documents in a matter into a practical strategy, issue list, and next-step plan — analysis to inform your judgment, not advice to rely on.
Analyze the facts and documents in this matter to develop a practical strategy and next-step plan. Identify the key issues, strongest arguments, weakest points, evidentiary gaps, procedural risks, and likely opponent responses, then recommend next actions. Separate legal analysis from practical strategy, and flag any assumption that needs attorney verification or jurisdiction-specific research.Use when you need a read on what to do next, how strong a position is, or which arguments and evidence matter most. Verify assumptions before acting.
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Was this helpful?